You might wonder if it matters whether a doctor’s office utilizes electronic medical recordssoftware to keep track of health records. In fact, it may influence the type of treatmentand quality of care patients receive, and how quickly they are seen.

This was the conclusion of a statistical analysis published in the New England Journal of Medicine, whichdetailed how having a quality electronic health records (EHR)system can help patients with diabetes. The authors’ main focus was to see if having EHR software instead of traditional paper records would prove to be advantageous.

Data was analyzed from practices that belonged to a regional quality collaborative and publicly reported their performances. The study’s authors reviewed data from 27,207 adult diabetes patients in 46 practices. For doctors who implemented electronic medical records software,the results showed that accurate and speedy treatment was 35.1 percentage points higher than in practices that used a paper-based system – a significant advantage.

The results also showed that there was a 10.2 percentage point annual improvement in care for patients whose doctors used EHR systems, with a 4.1 percentage point higher annual improvement in outcomes. They concluded that medical practices that had EHR software were able to not only quickly but effectively treat their diabetic patients. Doctors who useddiabetology-specificEHRsoftware like IMS from Meditab Software were at a significant advantage compared to those who did not.

Some doctors and medical administrators may argue that it is expensive and time consuming to convert to an electronic system, but there are many benefits to both patients and practices. Currently, the government offers incentive programs to administrators who switch, and eventually,implementing an EHR will be a requirement. Technology exists to make our lives easier and to help us solve our problems with accuracy and efficiency. Switching to an EHR program may have drawbacks, but the advantages definitely outweigh the disadvantages.